Forgot Password? | Print Page | Sign In | Create User Profile
News & Press: Court Cases


Tuesday, January 15, 2019  
Share |

Mikkelsen v. Hansen
Cal.App. 5th Dist. (F072990) 1/10/19

The court, following Scher v. Burke, 3 Cal.5th 136, held that plaintiffs could not establish an implied dedication of a road on non-coastal property because Civil Code Section 1009(b) bars all use of private real property after March 1972, not just recreational use, from ripening into a public dedication absent an express, written, irrevocable offer of such property to such use, and acceptance by a city or county. Scher dealt with an implied-in-law dedication (the period of adverse public use exceeds the period for prescription) and in this case the court held that Scher also applies to implied-in-fact (the period of adverse public use is less than the period for prescription) dedications.


California Land Title Association

1215 K Street #1816 Sacramento, CA 95814-3905
Email:  |  Phone: 916-444-2647  |   Fax: 916-444-2851